Why is this even a question that comes up? Well, it all started a few years back and has really come to the forefront in 2021 when the tax allowances worsened significantly. Originally, everyone had property in their personal name. Then, due to legislative changes like Section 24, there was a shift towards purchasing properties through companies. Now, the prevailing advice suggests you must buy in a corporate entity, specifically a limited company. However, this isn't strictly true. The best approach really depends on your individual situation, which is what we will explore in this post.
Consider a property generating £1,000 in rent with a £700 mortgage payment, leaving a £300 profit margin (ignoring maintenance for simplicity). Assuming a higher tax rate of 40% in the UK, you would pay £1,440 in tax on an annual profit of £3,600, netting £2,160 after taxes.
Now, with an annual income of £12,000 and mortgage interest of £8,400 (no longer considered a personal expense), you face a 40% tax on the total income (£4,800). However, a 20% tax relief on the interest payment (£1,680) adjusts the overall tax to £3,120. Consequently, the net income after £8,400 interest and £3,120 in tax is a mere £480.
This drastic change, introduced ironically by the conservative government, has significantly impacted the profitability of buy-to-let investments. But does this mean it's the end for buy-to-let landlords? Not necessarily.
For individuals in the 20% tax bracket, the net income before and after the legislation remains £720, illustrating the variable impacts based on one's tax bracket.
JD Rockefeller famously said, "Own nothing, control everything." This principle can apply to property investment through a limited company, offering a way to minimize personal risk while maximizing control. However, it's crucial to understand the implications fully and seek professional advice before making a decision.
This is not financial advice. Please consult with a financial advisor.